U.S. military’s new strategy does have the means for China. However, beware of China’s military and prepare the national strategic level with the United States policy toward China is not the same, this is done strictly distinguished.
Obama announced a new U.S. military strategy, which in the Sino-US relations have been sensitive to the Chinese public in natural and triggered a new round of heated debate, a large part of Internet users and even scholars exclaimed, this is surrounded by U.S. military efforts to strengthen China began to contain China, and Sino-US strategic confrontation into a sign.
How should look at the U.S. strategic updates, in particular, how to understand this new strategy the U.S. military implications of China, which is the reality of China-US relations and public awareness to important issues.
This new understanding of U.S. military strategy, we must first understand this is called After the Cold War, the United States received an unprecedented unipolar military hegemony, the U.S. strategic elite, whether moving in opposition have agreed to keep and maintain U.S. military supremacy is the core interests of the United States, but how, in a rapidly changing world military hegemony on the use of this advantage, the United States has been a huge difference. Bush administration in terms of the intention of reshaping the world military hegemony.
In fact, the war in Afghanistan and Iraq not only failed to fundamentally solve the security problems the United States and its partners, but greater uncertainty: cracks in the old alliance; Russia and other powers stronger resistance; most importantly, Although such long-term low-intensity war, but no less brutal nature, victory put an end to the Cold War the United States because of the advantage gained. Decade now, both in economic and military fields, the United States and all major powers have taken place in the balance of power is not conducive to the changes in the United States, one of the most compelling, most are also uncertain about the United States, is the rise of Chinese power.
Battlefield victory of the cost, resource consumption is a fatal strategy, which is Obama’s new military strategy underlying cause.
The contemporary international order is largely American order, which is the basic reality, but there are limitations of U.S. power, while the U.S. strategic policy mistakes, these mistakes and further limited the U.S. strategic advantage. Obama’s version of the U.S. military’s new strategy to address the core question is: first, back to front expansion and contraction of the global adjustment of military strategy.
There is no denying the fact that the U.S. does have a new strategy against China means. Contraction and the United States to take the strategic adjustment, did not have to consider that China would take to replace U.S. influence in the Western Pacific region, which is Taking the U.S. Defense Secretary Panetta repeatedly warned true semantics. However, beware of China’s military and prepare the national strategic level with the United States policy toward China is not the same, which is to be strictly distinguished. Sino-US summit and most experts agree that China-US relations is different from the US-Soviet relations and reopening of the Cold War realities and interests of the calculation do not support the Cold War mentality. As the lack of basic strategic mutual trust between the two countries, institutionalized platform for strategic dialogue has just started, combined with rapid changes in power between the two countries will naturally promote health concerns, and sometimes even hostility caused by the stimulation of the case, this is normal. Conversely, the Chinese military capabilities are as aware of the national capacity of the short board in recent years, increased defense spending, military capabilities of this latest development, largely balanced, and in the United States in the past has enjoyed unilateral advantage.
United States or other national security concerns of each targeted deployment, which is almost the history of the norm. But the decision whether the two countries would move toward full-scale military confrontation with the Cold War, the decisive factor is not in the military initiative, and in the overall situation of bilateral relations and major policies. Full-scale confrontation is a political decision, rather than military decision-making; Further, military preparations, and the balance of power, in many cases not only does not promote the fight, it will promote peace, which is the old saying of Over the past decade, China-US military balance, the most significant change is not the advantage of increasing the U.S., on the contrary, China’s power to bring change to America and the world some doubts. This is because the Cold War the U.S. and Europe habitual thinking, but to some extent with the United States and Europe because of the lack of institutionalization of China security dialogue mechanism, the lack of supporting soft power. These can only be through dialogue, cooperation and strengthen the construction of soft power to resolve.
U.S. military forces tend to balance a historic, this outlook may be affected since the end of the Cold War shape the future of the world’s most significant development. Including the United States, including, in many countries around the world will from its own perspective, interests and limitations to the prospect of prospects: how China will develop the military, will be based on how the concept of the mechanism on how to use its new power? This is not only the Americans are concerned about the problem, but given China’s own answer to the question.
相关的主题文章：